Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Picking Up the Pieces


On early Sunday morning I awoke to the sound of heavy rain beating down on my bedroom skylight.  Still half-asleep, I remembered that it was “Hurricane Day” – the day when Hurricane Irene was predicted to make landfall in New York.  For the first time in over 25 years, NY was going to experience a direct hit, and everyone was scrambling around in hurricane-mode.  The news and weather service had implored everyone days earlier to make necessary preparations and abide by mandatory evacuations – evacuations that affected 370,000 people in NYC and many more on Long Island.  Our place was not in any of the flood-prone areas, so thankfully we were able to stay.  But that didn’t mean we were immune from damage, so in the days prior, we too made our preparations, getting everything off our back deck, making sure we had flashlights and candles, and lowering the temperature of our fridge so that food would be less likely to spoil in the event of a power outage.

Photo: Our Japanese Zelkova lost only dead limbs and some leaves during the storm, Commack


So with much hesitation, build-up, and excitement, I got out of bed Sunday morning and cautiously peered out the rain-splattered window.  Outside, I saw Irene - an impenetrable layer of dark gray clouds from which rain poured down ferociously.  Her winds swept the limbs of our mature White Pines upwards in great gusts and made them look like they were dancing Christmas trees.  I looked out at our Japanese Zelkova and watched its branches move about its trunk in strange oscillations.  “Eh, not so bad out,” I thought to myself and went back to sleep, glad that the cataclysmic, doomsday scenario that was building inside my mind had not come true.            

In the days after Irene, I learned bits and pieces of information about the hurricane’s impact, and I also learned how cut-off from the world I felt with no electricity for 52 hours! (Good thing we had those candles!)  But I cannot complain when half a fridge full of groceries was our biggest loss.  As I drove around Long Island, I realized that many others were not so fortunate.  In Garden City where my parents live, breath-taking oaks that had stood the test of time, were lying in ruins across streets, cars, and houses.  In only a five block area, I counted at least 10 mature oak trees down.  My parents’ house was spared, but many of the neighbors I grew-up with were not as lucky.  70 ft. tall trees that I had walked past in elementary school fell over as easily as toothpicks, leaving a wake of destruction.  The town arborists were working round the clock to get the streets clear.

Photo: A mature, healthy Pin Oak crushes home and car, Garden City



I stared at a house a few homes down from my parents’ that was crushed by what had been an enormous Pin Oak (Quercus palustris).  The roof was caved in and branches and leaves were now part of their living room décor.  Somehow the tree had also managed to crush their car.  “Why did this tree fall?” I wondered to myself.  Trees that are unhealthy and have root or trunk decay are pre-disposed to failure during high-wind events.  But this tree was healthy and had no decay.  Trees that endure root severance from recent construction or sidewalk replacement are also pre-disposed to failure.  But this sidewalk was maybe 15 years old and no construction had taken place.  “It must be that the root system was uneven,” I thought, since there were more roots in the lawn area than under the concrete.  But then I looked down the block and saw another toppled Pin Oak that had had a vast area for its roots to grow.  Why did so many trees fall for what seems like no good reason?? 

Photo: More oaks windthrown by Hurricane Irene, Garden City


According to the National Weather Service, 4 inches of rain fell on Sunday in Central Park and the highest wind gust speed recorded at LaGuardia airport was 67 mph.  Typically lasting for about 20 to 40 seconds, wind gusts create a complex sway motion in the branches of a tree as the limbs move out of step with one another.  This movement helps prevent the tree from developing a dangerously large, pendulum-like sway.  But if the branch movement does not use up or dissipate enough energy, the energy can be transferred to the main trunk which if a sufficient force can topple the tree (James, K. 2003. Journal of Arboriculture 29(3)).  Saturated soils and high winds from Irene were simply too much for some of our trees to endure. 

Photo: Trees that have structural defects like this root girdled Red Oak (Quercus rubra) are pre-disposed to failure during high wind events, Garden City


Researchers have found that some tree species are more adapted to withstand hurricane-force winds than others.  After studying urban trees that survived devastating hurricanes in Florida, it was found that certain qualities made some trees more wind-resistant.  Losing leaves during the hurricane meant higher survival; native trees showed better survival than non-natives in some studies; tree species with a higher wood density had a higher survival rate; and surprisingly, decurrent trees with a spreading branch habit had significantly higher survival compared with excurrent trees with an upright, single straight trunk habit (Duryea et al. 2007. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 33(2)).  This type of excurrent branch habit combined with saturated soils and high winds may have led to the Pin Oaks’ downfall.

Although the climate and soils are obviously very different in Florida, a list of Wind-Resistant Trees compiled by Florida researchers may prove to be useful here.  When re-planting your fallen trees, consider planting trees with the highest or medium-high wind resistance and avoid planting trees with medium-low or lowest wind resistance. (From Urban Forest Hurricane Recovery Program series, Chapter 5 – Wind and Trees: Lessons Learned from Hurricanes, by Duryea and Kampf).  For more information, visit The University of Florida’s Trees and Hurricanes webpage at: http://hort.ifas.ufl.edu/treesandhurricanes/index.shtml

Tree Species with the Highest or Medium-High Wind Resistance (NOTE: tree species that only grow in the north were not included in the study)
Acer palmatum, Japanese maple
Betula nigra, river birch
Carpinus caroliniana, ironwood
Carya glabra, pignut hickory
Carya tomentosa, mockemut hickory
Cercis canadensis, red bud
Chionanthus virginicus, fringe tree
Cornus florida, dogwood
Diospyros virginiana, common persimmon
Ilex glabra, inkberry
Ilex opaca, American holly
Lagerstroemia indica, crape myrtle
Liquidambar styraciflua, sweetgum
Magnolia grandiflora, southern magnolia
Magnolia virginiana, sweetbay magnolia
Magnolia x soulangiana, saucer magnolia
Nyssa sylvatica, black tupelo
Ostrya virginiana, American hophombeam
Quercus shumardii, Shumard oak
Quercus stellata, post oak
Taxodium distichum, baldcypress

Tree Species with the Lowest or Medium-Low Wind Resistance
Acer negundo, boxelder
Acer rubrum, red maple
Acer saccharinum, silver mapple
Celtis laevigata, sugarberry
Celtis occidentalis, hackberry
Fraxinus pennsylvanica, green ash
Morus rubra, red mulberry
Platanus occidentalis, sycamore
Prunus serotina, black cherry
Quercus alba, white oak
Quercus phellos, willow oak
Salix x sepulcralis, weeping willow
Ulmus americana, American elm

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Planting for the Future


I don’t know much about politics.  In fact, I try to avoid the subject completely.  Yet recently, my staunch avoidance of the topic has proven to be quite difficult.  As the economy remains at a standstill, I feel like I’m being bombarded with everyone’s own personal agenda and “quick fix” solution to get our local, state, and federal governments back up to speed.  Even my daily perusal of Facebook’s news feed has taken a turn for the worse, as my “friends” keep posting things like, “CALL YOUR LEGISLATORS NOW!!! OR ELSE!!!!!!”  Personally, I don’t really care whether there’s a big or small government, so long as it works.  And unfortunately, things aren’t working quite optimally right now, to say the least.  Three years after the Lehman Brothers collapse, our nation is still in the throes of a great depression.

Currently, I’m in the middle of reading The Nature of New York – An Environmental History of the Empire State by David Stradling.  (Yes, I acknowledge that I am an incurable dork, so please hold the comments and eye rolls!)  Half a chapter of this book is dedicated to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the President who got our country out of the first Great Depression.  Like his cousin Teddy, FDR had a deep respect for nature and strongly promoted environmental conservation efforts throughout his career in public office.  However, unlike the romantic environmentalists of the 1800s who focused almost solely on the beauty and sanctity of nature, FDR recognized the economic benefits of conserving the nation’s soils and forests.    

Photo: Many of the trees planted during the conservation era were conifers, including pine and spruce.



Roosevelt authorized the planting of millions of trees, and would have given Johnny Appleseed a run for his money.  Just on his own property in Hyde Park, NY, Roosevelt oversaw the planting of more than half a million trees.  While governor of NY, FDR advocated that scientific forestry could help improve rural economies and rural lands.  On idle upstate farmland, where soil had become depleted and unsuitable for crops, Roosevelt encouraged the planting of trees which could improve the soil and be used for timber years later.  In 1931, just two years after the stock market crash, New York’s state nurseries grew and distributed over 40 million trees.  That same year, Roosevelt expanded New York State’s reforestation program with the passage of the Hewitt Act.  This act approved state spending of $20 million to purchase abandoned land and replant with trees over the course of eleven years.  Roosevelt’s conservation policy would, in his words, “not only preserve the existing forests but create new ones.”  Hundreds of thousands of acres of abandoned farmland was purchased by New York State from failing farmers and was planted with millions of trees. 

The success of Roosevelt’s conservation programs reached across the nation when he assumed the presidency.  As part of his first hundred days in office, he proposed the creation of the Civilian Conservation Corps.  Over the course of its nine years of existence, the CCC hired up to 350,000 unemployed men at one time who planted trees, created campgrounds, constructed hiking and ski trails, built dams and reworked streams for improved fishing, and completed other public works projects across the country.  The CCE was one of the most popular components of the New Deal, providing immediate relief for the 25% unemployment rate and long-term benefits for the environment.  Other organizations such as the Civil Works Administration and the Works Progress Administration also hired men for a variety of projects in natural areas.  Today, many of these trees and public projects still stand, providing testimony to the success of Roosevelt’s conservation programs.    

Photo: Today, organizations like the Nevada Conservation Corps and AmeriCorps carry-out valuable conservation work, including trail building.



In the 1930s, Franklin Delano Roosevelt believed that planting trees could help solve the economic problems of the Great Depression, by helping to alleviate the 25% unemployment rate.  Today, at less than 10% unemployment, we are apparently in a better situation, but there are many people out there who are searching and searching and cannot find work.  Perhaps a new Civilian Conservation Corps is needed.  So CALL YOUR LEGISLATORS NOW!!! AND TELL THEM PLANTING TREES WILL SAVE OUR ECONOMY!! OR ELSE!!!!!!  Hahaha.  All kidding aside, we need to seriously begin both planning and planting for our future.

Photo: Recently planted trees at an urban park.



Thursday, August 4, 2011

Tools for the Plant Doctor

Like any medical doctor, a plant doctor needs the proper tools, equipment, and reference materials to make accurate diagnoses of sick patients or plants.  As a person who lives by the motto “Be prepared,” I always make sure to bring with me all the tools I may need whenever I get a call to come check out a tree or other plant that is not doing well.  Thankfully, my vehicle is roomy enough for me and all my tools, as it has become my portable storage shed.   

Photo: Many times decay in trees is not as obvious as this large cavity in a European Linden (Tilia x europea) and special tools are required for assessment.


The most important equipment for diagnosing plant problems is perhaps the simplest – a gallon size plastic bag and some hand pruners.  With the hand pruners I can cut off an afflicted branch and store it in the plastic bag until I get back to our lab.  Plastic bags are better than paper bags because they keep in moisture and prevent samples from drying out too quickly.  Whenever I take a sample of a diseased or infested branch, I always make sure to obtain the symptomatic area, the healthy area, and the area in-between.  This “transition zone” from unhealthy to healthy tissue is often the most helpful for making accurate plant diagnoses.  If I can’t get my sample to the lab asap, I’ll store it in the fridge to prevent saprophytic decay fungi from decomposing it.  To date, I haven’t put a plant sample in my salad bowl, but I have to be extra careful when I’m hungry and tired!
Other tools that are important for taking samples are a pole pruner for cutting limbs that are out of reach, and a hand saw for removing afflicted branches that are too large for hand pruners.  I never go without my camera and always take lots of pictures to remind me of things later and to include in the diagnostic report.  A notepad and pen are essential.  I also like to bring some diameter tape for measuring the girth of trees.  I do carry around glass insect vials, but rarely get the chance to actually capture any offending insects.  A hand lens is useful for magnifying things in the field, but a microscope back at the lab is essential.  I remember once scrutinizing a California Privet (Ligustrum ovalifolium) shoot that was displaying symptoms of privet rust mite.  I squinted through my contact lenses at the curled, misshapen leaves, and after not seeing anything, I assumed that the mites had done their damage and left.   Just for kicks, I threw the shoot under the microscope, and lo and behold! there was an entire microscopic world scrambling all over the leaves, privet rust mites included!  I then promptly wondered what invisible little buggers were scrambling all over me!

Photo: California privet displaying symptoms of infestation by privet rust mite - curled, distorted, stunted, and yellowed new growth.



Other important tools for the tree doctor are a hammer and chisel for extracting wood from cankers and a pocket knife for looking beneath thin bark of branches.  As for trying to figure out how decayed a tree is, some highly specialized (and expensive) equipment has been developed.  One technique is to use a Resistograph®.  This microdrill takes advantage of the fact that decayed wood has lost strength and has a lower resistance to drill penetration than sound wood.  A graph that looks like an EKG is produced, and is great for impressing tech-oriented people and plant geeks alike.  Sounding with a mallet and using an increment borer or battery –operated drill are some less expensive methods of detecting decay in living trees.  A long rod is a cheap and easy way of probing into tree cavities to see how large they are.   
In addition to inspecting the leaves, branches, and trunk, it is absolutely critical to assess the belowground portion of a plant.  Frequently, the root cause of a plant problem is just that – the roots.  My most important tool here is a small, three-pronged hoe that I use to pull away soil and mulch from where the trunk meets the ground and examine this area known as the root collar.  I check for circling roots that can girdle the tree or shrub and to see if it is planted too deeply.  An air excavation tool can also be used to remove soil without injuring roots.  Another common belowground problem is soil compaction which means that sufficient water and air are not getting to the root system.  I use a penetrometer, a long pointed rod with a gauge at one end of it, to give me a qualitative assessment of soil compaction.  At new houses or recently re-modeled houses, my penetrometer always displays a red reading, indicating that the soil is too compacted for roots to grow.  A more quantitative assessment of soil compaction would be to take a bulk density test.  I also always bring a soil probe or hand shovel and bags for taking soil samples to measure nutrient levels and soil pH.

Photo: Soil compaction of this recently completed parking lot is the root cause of poor soil drainage and thinning of these Inkberry Hollies (Ilex glabra).



My other essential tools are the resources I can turn to when I need further information to make an accurate diagnosis.  There are a lot of books out there, but the ones that I find the most helpful are listed below.  Talking with colleagues and getting a second or third opinion also helps proper diagnosis.  Our local Cooperative Extension office has staff to help both professional horticulturists and homeowners diagnose plant problems.  Call CCE-Suffolk at 631-727-4126 and CCE-Nassau at 516-292-7990.  With the right tools and a lot of practice and patience, you’ll be a pro at diagnosing plant problems!
 
Books to Aid Plant Diagnosis:

• Costello, L.R., E.J. Perry, N.P. Matheny, J.M. Henry, P.M. Geisel. 2003. Abiotic Disorders of Landscape Plants: A Diagnostic Guide.  Oakland, CA, University of California, Publication 3420.

• Dirr, M.A. 2009. Manual of Woody Landscape Plants: Their Identification, Ornamental Characteristics, Culture, Propagation and Use, 6th Edition. Champaign, IL, Stipes Publishing.

• Johnson, W.T. and H.H. Lyon. 1991. Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs, 2nd Edition. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.

• Sinclair, W.A. and H.H. Lyon. 2005. Diseases of Trees and Shrubs, 2nd Edition.  Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.

• Vittum, P.J., M.G. Villani, and H. Tashiro. 1999. Turfgrass Insects of the United States and Canada. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.    





   




Sunday, July 31, 2011

You Can Be a Plant Doctor

Being a plant doctor is actually similar to being a medical doctor – you get a sick patient, you check for symptoms, you make a diagnosis, and then you prescribe treatment.  The only problem though with being a plant doctor, is that your patients cannot tell you directly what is wrong.  In order to figure out what’s causing a plant to be sick, you need to be inquisitive, open-minded, and very knowledgeable. 

Photo: Correctly diagnosing plant problems takes a thorough, comprehensive approach. 


For simplicity’s sake, plant diagnosticians have broken down the causes of plant problems into two categories – biotic and abiotic agents.  Biotic agents are living organisms (other than people) that cause plant problems, including insects, mites, fungi, bacteria, viruses, mammals, birds, and nematodes.  On the other hand, abiotic agents are non-living things or phenomena that cause plant problems.  Examples include hurricanes, construction damage, damage from a weed-wacker, and saturated soil. 

Correctly diagnosing plant problems is essential to maintaining the health, beauty, and longevity of your landscape.  But correct plant diagnosis can be quite challenging.  First off, there are many, many things that cause plant problems.  You have thousands of insects, diseases, nematodes, environmental factors, and physiological problems that can wreck havoc on your plants.  Just knowing all the potential causes of plant problems is a challenge, let alone correctly identifying them!  Many different factors are often working together to cause a plant problem.  Usually an insect or disease is not working in isolation; it is influenced by the current climate and the past and current health of the plant. 

Photo: Except for exotic pests, insect and disease problems of plants are often secondary causes of plant decline, not primary causes.  This drought and heat-stressed birch tree was predisposed to insect attack by the native bronze birch borer.  Notice the insects' exit holes in the trunk.



Another difficult thing about plant diagnosis is that many causal factors will produce similar-looking symptoms in the plant.  For example, both a drought-stressed tree and a salt-damaged tree will show brown crinkled leaves and leaf drop.  Furthermore, landscapes are variable and diverse.  Hundreds of species are planted in the landscape and each landscape has a different combination of plants.  Also, the planting sites themselves are highly variable, with differing soil, terrain, light exposure, and microclimate. 
Because of the difficulty of diagnosing plant problems, a thorough, comprehensive, step-by-step approach is needed.  Step 1 – Identify the plant.  Central to correct diagnosis is accurately identifying the species and sometimes the cultivar.  This is because you need to know what the cultural requirements, normal appearance, and growth characteristics are of a plant before you can detect that there is a problem.  For example, if a plant is yellow and drooping, you may conclude that it has a nutrient deficiency or is drought-stressed.  But if a Gold Thread Cypress (Chamaecyparis pisifera ‘Filifera Aurea’) is yellow and drooping, there is no problem and it doesn’t need more nitrogen or water. 

Step 2 – Inspect the site.  Look for conditions in the landscape that may lead to plant injury.  There are many questions to ask, including:  What is the slope of the terrain?  What is the soil texture – sandy, loam, clay?  What are the soil pH and nutrient levels?  Is it a well-drained soil?  Is it a compacted soil?  Are there dry or wet areas?  Is it a windy or protected site?  Is it shaded or in full sun?  Is there existing hardscape?  Is there existing vegetation nearby?  Are there animals or pets that access the site?  Is there mulch or grass beneath the plantings?
Photo: Figuring out what type of conditions at the site may lead to plant problems is essential for proper diagnosis.  Poor drainage is a common problem in urban landscapes that have compacted soils. 

Step 3 – Investigate the plant management and site history.  Gather as much information as possible and check your maintenance records if they exist.   Any information may provide you with clues to the problem.  There are many questions to ask here as well, including: When was the problematic plant planted?  What was the season of planting?  How large was it when planted? What type of nursery stock was used?  Were there any previous problems?  What are the current irrigation, fertilization, pest management, and pruning, practices?  Were any herbicides used?  Are there underground utilities?  Was there any recent construction(less than five years ago)?  Were there any recent abnormal weather conditions (less than two years ago)?  Were any deicing salts used?  

Step 4 – Inspect and describe the plant symptoms.  In most cases, you will only see the symptoms of a plant problem.  A symptom is the plant’s response to a disorder resulting in abnormal changes in the growth or appearance of a plant, which may be observed on the leaves, shoots, branches, flowers, trunk, or roots.  The difficulty of plant diagnosis is that symptoms are usually non-specific, meaning that several different disorders can result in the same symptom.  You need to gather more information and make close observations.  Ask, which plant part (roots, flowers, shoots, etc.) is affected and how severely?  Is there leaf chlorosis (yellowing)?  Is there leaf necrosis (browning and death)?  Is there discoloration or distortion?  Is the plant a normal size?  Is the plant wilting?  Are there a lot of dead branches and dieback?  Are there tattered leaves?  Any defoliation?  Is there early fall color?  Is the bark falling off?  Is there any bleeding or localized swelling?  Is there trunk splitting or cracking?  How do the roots look? 

Step 5 – Look for patterns and signs.  The pattern of symptoms throughout the plant and the landscape can sometimes give you a hint as to the problem.  If symptoms are uniformly distributed throughout the plant, it can mean that there is an underlying issue with the root system.  If only one plant is affected it can mean that there is an abiotic problem at that specific micro-site.  If only one species is affected, it can mean that there is a species-specific insect or disease problem.  Also look for signs.  When you actually SEE the presence or activity of an insect or disease, this is called, in very scientific terms, a “sign.”  A sign is direct evidence of an insect or disease.  Examples of signs are: adult insects, eggs, nymphs, larvae, pupae, cocoons, shed insect skins, frass, protective wax, exit holes, and fruiting bodies of a fungus.  These can be collected and sent to a lab for diagnosis.
Step 6 – Inspect the rest of the plant for abnormalities.  It is so easy for us to just think about the above-ground portions of trees and shrubs because that is what is visible to us.  But we really need to examine the roots and soil to get at the underlying cause of many landscape problems.

And lastly, Step 7 – Test likely causes and make a diagnosis.  Take soil, water, and tissue samples if needed and get them tested.  Make sure that your diagnosis is consistent with standard descriptions of the problem.

Diagnosing and correcting plant problems is challenging.  But with a comprehensive approach and practice, you’ll be able to figure out what’s wrong with a sick plant.


Monday, July 11, 2011

One in a Million

It’s been said that a picture is worth a thousand words.  But for Washington DC, a picture was worth $50 million.  In 1999, satellite pictures in the Washington Post clearly displayed a dramatic loss of tree cover in the District of Columbia, showing far more pavement than trees.  The accompanying article explained that the number of acres of heavy tree cover had dropped by 64 percent over the past two decades, as trees died due to disease, development, and old age, and were not replaced.  The shocking pictures motivated philanthropist and long time resident, Mrs. Betty Brown Casey to generously donate $50 million to re-green the city.  Her donation established the non-profit Casey Trees, which is officially charged with restoring, enhancing, and protecting the tree canopy of our nation’s capital. 

Photo: Trees, gardens, and parks make our densely populated cities liveable, like this tree-lined street of Park Slope, Brooklyn.



During the summer of 2002, I helped Casey Trees with the initial tree inventory and planning process.  Using a hand-held GIS, I traipsed around Washington DC with volunteers measuring and assessing the health of individual street trees.  As we walked the innumerable city blocks, I entered on my digital map the tree information and where new planting opportunities were.  After three months, our dedicated team finished inventorying over 100,000 street trees.  The soles of our sneakers had grown thin, our calves had grown wide, and our bright yellow safety vests had become tattered and stained.  Nevertheless, we were proud of our accomplishment and excited that DC would soon become greener with our help. 
For nearly the past decade, Casey Trees has worked alongside the DC government planting and maintaining the urban forest.  Over 10,000 trees have been planted and thousands of people have been educated on the important role that trees play in making our communities livable.  Casey Trees continues to work diligently towards its goal of creating 40% tree cover in Washington DC by 2035.  (For more information, visit www.caseytrees.org)

Photo:  Tree-lined street of Washington DC



Urban reforestation programs are taking the country by storm.  Not to be outdone, in 2007 Mayor Bloomberg announced a new initiative to create “a greener, greater New York.”  As part of his new plan for NYC, an ambitious goal was created to plant one million new trees across Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island by 2017.  Led by the NYC Department of Parks and Recreation and the non-profit New York Restoration Project, MillionTreesNYC has already planted nearly half a million trees.  70% of trees will or have been planted on public land in existing parks and forests and along streets.  The remaining trees will or have been planted on private land on individual properties or institutions.
Photo: Planetree (Platanus x acerifolia) is the most common street tree in NYC, comprising 15% of the trees

Although MillionTreesNYC is a citywide initiative, half a dozen neighborhoods have been identified as focus planting areas.  The neighborhoods of East Harlem, Manhattan; East New York, Brooklyn; the Rockaways, Queens; Stapleton, Staten Island; Hunts Point, Bronx; and Morrisania, Bronx are at a critical need for trees, with higher than average rates of childhood asthma and lower than average number of street trees.  Planting trees, especially in these areas, will hopefully reduce the pollutants that trigger respiratory disorders and help create a healthier living environment for all.

If you live in any of the five boroughs, you can request a free street tree (if you don’t have a tree already) at:  www.milliontreesnyc.org/html/involved/request_a_tree.shtml  If you don’t feel like waiting, you could instead plant a street tree on your own by first obtaining a tree planting permit.  Be aware that there are tree height and species restrictions.  Learn how to care for your new street tree at one of the many free workshops offered by the MillionTrees Stewardship Corps. 
Photo: A greener city - park in Chelsea, Manhattan

It is truly remarkable that urban trees in NYC, Washington DC, and other cities have such a positive impact on the environment and people’s well-being.  Even more remarkable is that politicians are recognizing the importance of trees!  Through the efforts of MillionTreesNYC and the other sustainable initiatives of PlaNYC, New York City - the greatest city in the world - will soon become the Big “Green” Apple! 


Annually, it is estimated that NYC’s 592,000 street trees provide:
·         $52 million in increased property values;
·         $36 million in stormwater runoff abatement;
·         $27 million in energy savings;
·         $5.3 million in improved air quality; and
·         $0.75 million in carbon dioxide reduction.
(STRATUM results based on 2005-06 NYC Street Tree Census)

For more information, visit MillionTreesNYC at: www.milliontreesnyc.org