Tuesday, September 20, 2011

The Dying Trees


I’ve been delaying writing about this topic because it’s such a downer.  But since it is an important one, I’ll give it a go, so please bear with me...  Our trees are dying.  Someone who doesn’t know a lot about trees (ie. most people) would consider this statement an alarmist scare tactic, typical of the tree-hugging, over-exaggerating, environmental movement that constantly spits out doomsday hyperboles in the futile hope of stirring the public towards action.  Unfortunately, to state that our country’s trees are dying is no exaggeration.  

Photo: Many street trees on Long Island have died because of the Asian Longhorned Beetle



Invasive insect pests and new fatal tree diseases are seriously impacting our nation’s forests, our community’s street trees, and our own backyards.  Over the past century, global trade has expanded exponentially and has inadvertently facilitated the introduction of invasive pests into this country through various means including wood packing materials.  Insect pests and diseases that are native to other areas of the world are able to cause an alarming amount of damage to our trees.  Because our trees did not evolve with non-native or new insects or diseases, they did not develop a natural defense mechanism to ward them off and therefore succumb easily.  What our trees face today is analogous to what the American Indians faced when Europeans first came to America.  With no immunity developed against Eurasian infectious diseases, Native Americans died by the millions.  Likewise, our native trees are dying by the millions to diseases such as Chestnut Blight and Dutch Elm Disease, the smallpox and bubonic plague of the tree world. 

Photo: A mature American Elm exhibiting symptoms of Dutch Elm Disease; Garden City



It is incredible how quickly invasive insect pests and new fatal tree diseases have altered and continue to alter the landscape.  Among the most dramatic changes, our eastern hardwood forests have lost an estimated 4 billion American Chestnut trees (Castanea dentata) due to the fatal Chestnut Blight disease.  Over 100 years after the introduction of Chestnut Blight into the US via chestnut seeds or young plants from Eastern Asia, the American Chestnut Foundation® is still trying to develop an American Chestnut tree that is resistant to the disease.  Meanwhile, oaks and hickories have grown in where majestic Chestnut trees once stood. 

But our oaks are at risk as well – in 1995 Sudden Oak Death was first reported in California.  Serious efforts have been underway to make sure that this aggressive, lethal disease does not spread to the East Coast where it could easily infect our native oaks including Northern Red Oak (Quercus rubra) and Pin Oak (Quercus palustris).  But if you do see an oak tree around here wilting and dying quickly, it’s probably the aggressive and lethal Oak Wilt disease, first identified in 1944, instead of the aggressive and lethal Sudden Oak Death.

I haven’t even mentioned some of our newer insect pests, including the Asian Longhorned Beetle, first discovered in Brooklyn in 1996.  The Asian Longhorned Beetle has killed tens of thousands of trees in New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Illinois, including our beloved native Sugar Maple (Acer saccharum).  And then there’s the Emerald Ash Borer, first discovered in Michigan in 2002, which is extripating all our native Ash trees, including Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) and White Ash (Fraxinus americana).

Photo: Despite extensive trapping and monitoring efforts like this purple sticky trap, the Emerald Ash Borer continues to spread and is expected to be found on Long Island in the near future



With these deadly insects and diseases, our entomologists, plant pathologists, ecologists, and plant breeders certainly have a lifetime of work cut out for them.  Millions of dollars in research, outreach, and education are being invested to contain or at least slow the spread of certain tree pests.  But our trees are still dying and our natural world has already changed.  It is disheartening to know that the woods I occasionally hike through and the tree-lined streets I walk by are very different from those that my grandparents and great-grandparents experienced. 

In this day and age, it is difficult to have a positive outlook on the future of our nation’s forests and trees.  Perhaps there is some solace in knowing that most people today who take a hike in our eastern woodlands don’t realize that American Chestnut, American Elm, and Eastern Hemlock should be there, but are missing.  Instead, they see a lush forest of uninterrupted greenery.  Ignorance may truly be bliss, and I sometimes wish that I could go back and experience nature again without knowing all the things that I know now. 

But what about the future?  Do I dare wonder what our forests and landscapes will look like in another 100 years?  What trees will be left?  And more importantly, how many people will remember all the trees we’ve lost?  Asking these questions makes me think of the concept of “shifting baselines,” a term coined by biologist Daniel Pauly in 1995.  Establishing a baseline or reference point for a degraded ecosystem is important because then we know what we have to do to work to restore it.  But over time, undocumented knowledge is lost, and the baseline can slowly and subtly shift until we accept degraded habitats as “normal.”  Perhaps when the last Ash tree falls or the last Sugar Maple dies, our children will never have known that baseball bats used to be made from the wood of ash trees, or that maple syrup used to be made from Sugar Maple sap and not high fructose corn syrup.  Future generations may accept forests devoid of these tree species as normal.  It is therefore of utmost importance for ecologists today to document as much information about our forests as possible, so that we can relay this knowledge to future generations and prevent baseline reference points from shifting too far.  Even if experts cannot stop the Emerald Ash Borer or Sudden Oak Death, studying our trees and forests will not have been in vain.  Sadly, scientists must come to terms with the reality that our trees are in fact dying.